🧞‍♂️ New to Exponential Scale? Each week, I provide tools, tips, and tricks for tiny teams with big ambitions that want to scale big. For more: Exponential Scale Podcast | Scalebrate | Scalebrate Hub

Founding Supporters: Support the following people and companies because they supported us from the beginning: DataEI | Dr. Bob Schatz | .Tech Domains | Fairman Studios | Jean-Philippe Martin | RocketSmart AI | UMBC

"You're looking at job postings, thinking: "I need a designer. A backend engineer. A QA specialist. A community manager. A producer."

Five roles. Five salaries. Five coordination headaches.

Meanwhile, a game called Terraria has sold 60+ million copies, generated over $500 million in revenue, and maintained a 10+ year development cycle with consistent free updates.

Their team size? Never more than 11 people at peak. Often as few as 8.

While AAA game studios employ hundreds (sometimes thousands) to ship titles, Re-Logic, the team behind Terraria, proved that versatile generalists beat specialized headcount every single time.

They didn't build departments. They built a team where everyone could wear multiple hats, pivot quickly, and own outcomes end-to-end.

Terraria launched in 2011. Created by Andrew "Redigit" Spinks as essentially a solo project with minimal help, it became an instant indie hit.

But here's what's remarkable: as Terraria grew into a cultural phenomenon, Re-Logic stayed small. Intentionally.

The numbers:

Compare that to typical AAA game studios:

They were 18x more efficient than traditional game studios.

How?

By hiring versatile generalists who could do multiple jobs, not specialists who could only do one.

Andrew Spinks didn't just code—he designed, balanced gameplay, created content, and managed community feedback. His team didn't have "lanes." They had ownership areas that overlapped and flexed based on what the game needed.

Successful investing is often less about making the right moves and more about avoiding the wrong ones. With our guide, 13 Retirement Investment Blunders to Avoid, you can learn ways to steer clear of common errors to help get the most from your $1M+ portfolio—and enjoy the retirement you deserve.

Get your free guide today.

Most companies hire for specialization: "We need a React developer. And a Node.js engineer. And a DevOps person."

This makes sense in traditional corporate environments. But for microteams, it's a trap.

Here's why:

The specialist model:

The versatility model:

Think of specialists like a factory assembly line: Each worker does one thing. Fast. But if one person is sick, the line stops.

Think of versatile generalists like a pit crew: Everyone has a primary role, but they can jump in anywhere when needed. The team adapts in real-time.

Re-Logic operated like a pit crew. And that's why they shipped updates faster and more consistently than studios with 50x their headcount.

You can't afford to hire specialists for every function. You don't have 200 employees. You have 3, 5, maybe 10 if you're scaling.

That means every hire needs to be a force multiplier, not a single-purpose tool.

Here's what versatility gives you:

When everyone can code, design, write, and debug, you don't wait for "handoffs."

Big team workflow: Designer creates mockup → waits for engineer → engineer builds → waits for QA → QA finds bugs → waits for engineer to fix → ships in 3 weeks

Microteam workflow: Designer/engineer creates and ships in 3 days because they can do all the steps themselves

If your only backend engineer quits, you're in crisis mode.

If you have 3 people who can all do backend work (even if one is "the best" at it), you're resilient.

Versatile people understand the full system. They see how their work impacts everything else.

Specialists optimize their domain without considering downstream effects.

The more specialists you have, the more meetings you need to keep everyone aligned.

Versatile teams communicate less because everyone understands the context.

Re-Logic's success was because they were small, and versatile.

Here's how to build a team of versatile generalists (not narrow specialists):

A T-shaped person has:

Example: Backend Engineer

Example: Designer

When you hire, look for people with one spike (depth) and wide surface area (breadth).

Most interviews test for depth: "Tell me about your experience with Kubernetes."

Add questions that test for breadth:

You're not looking for experts in everything. You're looking for people who are comfortable being uncomfortable—who don't say "that's not my job."

A 10-year specialist is often less valuable than a 3-year generalist who learns fast.

Why? Because markets change. Tools evolve. Startups pivot.

The person who can pick up new skills in weeks is more valuable than the person who's mastered yesterday's stack.

Interview for learning velocity:

The best answers show curiosity, resourcefulness, and speed.

Versatile generalists are worth more than narrow specialists. Pay accordingly.

Typical market logic: "You're a mid-level designer, so we'll pay mid-level rates."

Microteam logic: "You can design, code basic features, write copy, and manage product roadmaps. You're replacing 3 people. We'll pay you like it."

Re-Logic's small team was likely paid very well because each person delivered the output of 2-3 specialists.

Versatility doesn't happen by accident. You need to structure work so people must flex across domains.

How:

When people are forced to do adjacent work, they become versatile by necessity.

Most companies celebrate specialists: "Sarah crushed that backend refactor!"

In a microteam, celebrate breadth: "Carlos designed, coded, tested, and shipped the new checkout flow solo in 3 days."

What you celebrate, you get more of.

Example 1: Re-Logic

Result: Faster updates, tighter cohesion, absurd efficiency

Example 2: Superhuman (Email SaaS)

Result: 99% customer satisfaction, fastest email client in the world, built by a team of 5

Example 3: Figma (Early Days)

Result: Shipped a browser-based design tool that beat Adobe. Built by a team that could each do multiple jobs

Versatility isn't always the answer. Here's when you need specialists:

At scale, specialization makes sense. You can afford dedicated roles, and coordination costs are unavoidable.

But if you're under 20 people? Versatility wins.

If you're building medical devices or financial software, you need certified specialists (compliance, legal, security).

Solution: Hire specialists for the regulated parts, versatile generalists for everything else.

If you're building AI infrastructure or quantum computing software, you need PhDs with deep expertise.

Solution: Hire specialists for the core tech, versatile generalists for product/ops/growth.

Re-Logic chose the versatility model and built a $500M+ game with 11 people.

That's the power of hiring for breadth, not just depth.

You don't need to overhaul your hiring process today. Just start thinking in versatility, not specialization.

Here's what you can do in 10 minutes:

That's it. You just started building a more versatile team.

The game industry is obsessed with headcount. AAA studios brag about 500-person teams. They treat big teams as a sign of legitimacy.

Re-Logic ignored all of that.

They stayed small. They hired people who could do multiple jobs. They moved fast, shipped consistently, and built one of the best-selling indie games of all time.

60 million copies. 11 people.

You don't need an army. You need versatility.

Hire people who can wear multiple hats. Build systems that encourage cross-functional work. Celebrate generalists, not just specialists.

That's how you build a microteam that punches 50x above its weight.

Google AdSense's Auto ads lets you designate ad-free zones, giving you full control over your site’s layout and ensuring a seamless experience for your visitors. You decide what matters to your users and maintain your site's aesthetic. Google AdSense helps you balance earning with user experience, making it the better way to earn.

Take control of your ads

A complete versatility hiring and development system with T-shaped skills mapping tools, interview question banks, team capability audits, cross-training playbooks, and role design templates. Everything you need to build a microteam where everyone can wear multiple hats and eliminate single points of failure.

Re-Logic built a $500M+ game with 11 people by hiring versatile generalists, not narrow specialists. While AAA game studios need 200+ employees, Re-Logic achieved 18x better efficiency (Revenue Per Employee) by building a team where everyone could flex across multiple domains. This playbook shows you how to replicate their model: hire for breadth + depth, eliminate bottlenecks, ship faster, and scale without bloat.